Re: [rpm2html 1.5 patch] signature processing

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Peter Hanecak (hanecak@megaloman.com)
Date: Tue Nov 07 2000 - 02:05:29 EST

Hello,

On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Daniel Veillard wrote:

> well one still need to open the header to get the name/version/release/arch
> (to base anything on filenames is really broken).

Does "open the header" means also running "signature resolving"?

> > b) comparing html or rdf output and current page is useless because it
> > happens AFTER closer inspection of package ("signature resolving" is
> > alredy done).
>
> No, because if the timestamp has changed for whatever reason and you
> recompute the output, it's still better to check to avoid trashing http
> caches.

I meant it "useless" for "signature resolving" issues, not for rpm2html as
a whole.

> > Is (A) correct?
>
> yes

So do I have to make something regarding caching or anything with
"signature resolving"?

Peter 

-- 
===================================================================
  Peter Hanecak <hanecak@megaloman.com>
  GPG pub.key: http://www.megaloman.com/gpg/hanecak-megaloman.txt
===================================================================

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 10 2001 - 18:40:13 EDT